Apprehension Builds as FDA Aims to Get its Quality Initiative Right the Second Time
This article was originally published in The Gold Sheet
As FDA lays out plans to unleash the potential of new manufacturing technologies by reorganizing its quality oversight around metrics, industry worries about the risk of unintended consequences.
You may also be interested in...
Ten years into FDA’s quality initiative, CDER Director Janet Woodcock acknowledges continued resistance to investing in QbD as a way of preventing quality problems in commercial manufacturing. Yet others in FDA and industry see adoption of the science- and risk-based approach spreading, even though manufacturers are often reluctant to disclose how much money it’s saving them.
The US FDA shaved months from review of Gilead’s Veklury (remdesivir) for COVID-19 with post-approval commitments for multiple stability studies. The Pink Sheet takes a deep dive look at discussions within the agency and with the sponsor.
FDA historically has based 100% of drug adulteration warning letters on inspections but COVID-19-related travel restrictions began changing that in FY 2020, when 2% of drug GMP warning letters were based on testing import samples. The change became even more pronounced in the first two months of FY 2021, with 59% of actions related to sample testing and 41% to inspections.