Advancing Comparative Effectiveness Research: An Interview with Sean Tunis
Executive Summary
Sean Tunis is director of the Center for Medical Technology Policy and a leading advocate for comparative effectiveness research and evidence-based medicine. Formerly Director of the Office of Clinical Standards and Quality and CMO of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, he discusses the state of comparative effectiveness advocacy and his current work developing medical device protocols aimed at providing actionable information to physicians, patients, and payors.
You may also be interested in...
Scant Intersection Between Patient-Centered Outcomes Research And Personalized Medicine’s Needs
On its face, comparative effectiveness research and its new cousin, patient-centered outcomes research, would seem to support, if not enable, personalized medicine. But as currently established in the US, there is little conceptual overlap. That’s largely because much CER and patient-centered outcomes research steer clear of anything that smacks of the development of cost data, which personalized medicine may need to truly make its value proposition.
Health Care Reform: Further Taxing The Device Innovation Model
The tax on medical devices was a late addition to the health reform legislation but it quickly became the industry's focal point over concerns that, in an already difficult environment, this added burden could threaten to disrupt the traditional device innovation model.
Top Device Stories of 2009: A Year of Economic Revival and Regulatory Risk
2009 was the most difficult year the device industry faced in a long time, particularly given the boom years that preceded it. Public and private investors grew nervous and sat on the sidelines, as did most corporate acquirers. As a result, most start-ups found it difficult to raise money and VCs were frustrated by the poor returns being generated, especially compared with the previously frothy climate. The silver lining may be that there are signs that the economic environment may be improving and that corporate acquirers will continue to pay a premium for the right deal. Overhanging all of this, however, is the specter of health care reform and its impact on the device industry, whether through a device tax, comparative effectiveness or some unanticipated other result, meaning the industry is far from out of the woods.