End of an Era for GSK and Exelixis
Executive Summary
GlaxoSmithKline in October decided to decline its option to license Exelixis's late-stage XL184 small molecule oncology candidate and four earlier-stage compounds, effectively ending the six-year R&D collaboration between the two firms. The decision ends an early foray into license-and-option agreements by GSK, a company that has been at the forefront of striking option deals over the past several years. Its latest such agreement was announced the same day the Exelixis deal wrapped, as part of an alliance with the Austrian vaccines play Affiris in the area of Alzheimer's disease.
You may also be interested in...
Biogen Idec Taps Exelixis' Scangos To Be New CEO
Exelixis’s long-time CEO George Scangos, PhD, is taking the the helm of Biogen Idec. The move is counterintuitive, both for the commercial stage Biogen and for Scangos, whose career has largely been focused on research and early development and free of activist shareholder pressure.
Biogen Idec Taps Exelixis' Scangos To Be New CEO
Exelixis’s long-time CEO George Scangos, PhD, is taking the the helm of Biogen Idec. The move is counterintuitive, both for the commercial stage Biogen and for Scangos, whose career has largely been focused on research and early development and free of activist shareholder pressure.
Bristol-Myers's Grand Ambitions in Oncology
Bristol-Myers aims to become an oncology powerhouse in the next five years. Through M&A, alliances, and internal R&D, Bristol-Myers is building an armamentarium of oncology assets that allows it to take multiple "shots on goal." It is leveraging its past experiences in the field as it also adds new skill sets in biologics, market access, and biomarkers. But the market has become more competitive, as companies look to participate in one of the few growth areas of pharma. Bristol, like others, is carving out space in the Avastin-ineligible or -intolerant portion of the market, particularly in the gastrointestinal, colorectal, and head-and-neck cancer areas. Even if successful, current late-stage development projects aren't likely to contribute much to revenues before 2011-and oncology products have slow ramp-ups. With a patent cliff looming in 2012, the company needs new products now.